Letter to the editor: Bills will help lower prescription drug costs | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Bills will help lower prescription drug costs

It’s time to lower prescription drug costs in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania’s Medicaid program is paying billions more than it should for prescription drugs, due to the growing influence of pharmacy benefit managers. Designed to save Medicaid dollars, PBMs have seen their payments from the commonwealth increase by more than $1 billion in only four years to $2.84 billion. These exorbitant profits are increasing prescription drug costs at community pharmacies for countless Pennsylvanians.

Pennsylvania law lacks any real transparency to ensure PBMs are treating pharmacies and their patients fairly. In fact, a report from the Pennsylvania auditor general found that PBMs are keeping hundreds of millions of dollars through what is called “spread pricing.” Current Pennsylvania law doesn’t prohibit spread pricing, which is the difference between what an insurer pays and what is reimbursed to the pharmacies.

To better serve our communities and drive down the costs of prescription drugs, a package of bills in both the House and Senate have been introduced. Please join our coalition — Your Pennsylvania Community Pharmacies — in supporting and advocating for Pennsylvania House Bills 941, 942, 943, 944 and 945 and Senate Bills 825, 829 and 789. Learn more about these bills, and contact your state legislators here: papharmacists.com/page/ActionCenter. Tell your legislators to support this package of bills because it will lower prescription drug costs and ultimately save lives.

Patricia Epple


The writer is CEO of the Pennsylvania Pharmacists Association (papharmacists.com).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.