Letter to the editor: Bills would work to end gerrymandering | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Bills would work to end gerrymandering

Let’s work together to stop partisan gerrymandering. Gerrymandering puts power in the hands of a few — the politicians — at the expense of the rest of us — the citizenry.

We can stop this crooked process by telling our state reps that we support House Bills 22 and 23. Citizens’ activist groups are demanding reform in how legislative districts are created, as evidenced by high-profile court cases in Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Maryland.

If passed, the bills will create an independent 11-member citizens redistricting commission consisting of four Democrats, four Republicans and three other members tasked with creating fairer, more compact, contiguous districts that don’t resemble odd shapes. Under proposed new rules, political lines that “crack” constituencies — i.e., divide them between districts — will not be permitted in the state House.

Who among us can afford another decade of unaccountable government? These odd-shaped districts produce gridlock, and little legislation gets passed. Before the end of the current legislative session, contact your legislators and encourage them to co-sponsor House Bills 22 and 23.

Since the inception of our republic and its beginnings as a fledgling democracy, political districts have been crafted by the party in power in such a manner as to create fiefdoms for the “elites” to reign over the masses. We must change the redistricting process with legislation and/or a voter referendum.

Learn more about the proposed “two bills, one commission” at fairdistrictspa.com/solution.

George A. Karpacs

South Park Township


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.