Letter to the editor: Blackout trauma in New York | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Blackout trauma in New York

So a small part of NYC lost power from right after dinner to right before bed. Wall to wall, commercial free cable news coverage. It was such a catastrophe that Komrade Bill DeBlasio suspended his presidential campaign, aka the No Chance in Hell Express, and immediately got back home, later commending his fellow Noo Yawkas handling it “with that trademark NYC grit and toughness.” Uh-huh.

Grit and toughness for a three-hour outage. “But it was sooooooo hot!” Poor dears. If the life-threatening heat got to be too much for these plucky lads and lasses, they always could have employed the last-ditch, desperate maneuver of walking across the street or down a block or two to where they still had power and bask in the A/C.

Hey, Komrade, we lost power at my house four times just this week … you could look it up. And if you want grit and toughness, how about the freak windstorm this year, in the dead of winter, sub-freezing temperatures, that knocked out the power — and the heat — for 10 hours here, and for four or five days for some folks? That’s toughness.

Noo Yawk used to be the fuhgeddaboutit, we got this, town. Now, apparently it’s New York, the marshmallow capital of the country, where “surviving” for three hours without electricity in a small part of the city qualifies for the Silver Star.

James F. Cataldi


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.