Letter to the editor: Cable-bill woes | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Cable-bill woes

I agree with letter-writer Mary Ann Buffer (”Let’s cancel cable,” March 5, TribLIVE). Two years ago, I bundled my phone, TV and internet with Comcast and was told it would cost $122 per month. I have never been billed, or paid, only $122 per month. My first monthly bill was $132.66. I questioned it, but was told simply that’s what it is. I said I would like to cancel my service, and was told that would cost me $200. At that point, I just paid $132.66 per month for over a year.

When I received my bill for January 2019, it had increased to $164.93 per month. I complained to numerous employees, but could get no explanation.

I don’t understand why I have to pay for hundreds of channels I don’t watch. Why isn’t Comcast investigated for this racket? I am now paying more for this bundle than I used to pay for the services separately. Why bundle them?

I saw a Comcast promotion offering a bundle for $79.99 for new customers. I was thanked for being a good Comcast customer since its inception. Must be the longer you’re with them, the more you pay.

Jane Gsell


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.