Letter to the editor: Cal U’s softball rain delay | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Cal U’s softball rain delay

California University of Pennsylvania shares the disappointment of WPIAL officials, players and softball fans who hoped to see the 2019 softball championships played at Cal U (“WPIAL again forced to move softball championships,” April 12, TribLIVE.) 

A major renovation is underway at the University’s Lilley Field, and work won’t be done in time to host the games.

What’s the holdup? In a word, weather.

During the fall construction season California experienced 69 days of rain, with up to 3 inches falling in a single day. That relentless rain — and the time it took for the field to dry out between storms — delayed all aspects of the project, from excavating soil to pouring concrete footers for the dugouts, grading the playing field and installing the outfield turf.

Cal U’s offer to host the 2019 softball championships was made in good faith — but we can’t control the weather. The university alerted WPIAL officials as soon as it became clear that the field would not be ready in time for the event.

We look forward to fair weather so we can complete the project, and we remain hopeful that the WPIAL softball championships will return to Cal U in 2020.

Christine Kindl

California, Pa.

The writer is vice president for communications and marketing at California University of Pennsylvania.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.