Letter to the editor: Call for Styrofoam ban | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Call for Styrofoam ban

The unsustainable amount of single- use plastics that Americans use every day terrifies me: 150 million tons of plastic produced each year are used only once, and the problem continues to worsen.

Styrofoam, which is very difficult to recycle, is a big contributor to this problem. It makes up a sizeable portion of the North Atlantic garbage patch, and its carcinogenic properties are terrifying. Very soon, just eating fish could lead to an increased risk of cancer, at a level where everyone on earth is exposed.

Although I am worried for my safety now, if nothing is done, this issue will only get worse. I worry about the health of my children and children’s children due to issues that, infuriatingly, can be easily avoided.

There are dozens of alternatives to Styrofoam that are incredibly cheap to make and don’t cause nearly as large of an environmental impact. Ironically, the only thing that keeps humans from easily solving this problem is humans themselves: the chemical industry. The fact that these corporations prioritize profit over the well-being of the human race is one of the most frustrating things I have ever encountered.

Their unwillingness to regulate themselves is the reason I support a statewide ban on polystyrene foam cups and takeout containers, as other states and countries have done.

We must call upon our legislators to support a ban on foam cups and containers.

Emily Giudici


The writer is an environmental campaign organizer for PennEnvironment and a student at the University of Pittsburgh majoring in urban studies and Japanese.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.