Letter to the editor: Capitalism & taxes | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Capitalism & taxes

Capitalism & taxes

Letter-writer Joel I. Last (“Fairness in taxation,” May 2, TribLIVE) argues for “a more capitalistic view of fairness in taxation.” His suggested mechanism is to “calculate the amount of taxes needed and divide by the number of taxpayers, and tax everyone the same regardless of income.” Let’s see how that plays out.

According to the Tax Foundation (taxfoundation.org), in 2015, there were 141,204,625 taxpayers who paid $1.454 trillion in personal taxes. Average taxes paid were $10,299. The top 1% of taxpayers had an average income of $1,412,046 in 2015. An average tax payment of $10,299 approaches “chump change” for someone (or household) making $1.4 million per year.

At the other end of the income spectrum, we have a minimum-wage worker making $14,500 a year. Deduct $10,299 in federal income taxes and other taxes, and our minimum wage worker (absent the Earned Income Credit), brings home $220 a month!

I don’t consider Last’s proposal as equitable or fair. It’s capitalism in the most draconian sense. I would not worry about high-income taxpayers. They have a well-developed sense of self-preservation and the means of accumulating wealth (unrelated to income) that the rest of us can only dream about.

James Kvitkovich

Hempfield


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.