Letter to the editor: Capitalizing on Pittsburgh’s energy advantages | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Capitalizing on Pittsburgh’s energy advantages

The article “Texas report: Pennsylvania 2nd only to us in natural gas production” (March 13, TribLIVE) pointed out that even though Texas is the United States’ de facto energy capital, Pennsylvania is a major player. Southwestern Pennsylvania has a legacy in energy looking back some 150 years and continues to be blessed with both ample natural and human resources in energy that address fuel and feedstock demands, in addition to contributing a diverse portfolio economy that plays to all our strengths.

The Pittsburgh region is located atop one of the world’s largest natural gas reserves, and we are investing strategically to make the most of this advantage. We have developed a robust natural gas and downstream manufacturing strategy that seeks to leverage the anchor investment made by Royal Dutch Shell and to increase our region’s overall attractiveness for other energy and energy-related manufacturing investments.

Industries in the downstream of the natural gas industry have the potential to multiply the region’s GDP, increase tax revenues and create well-paying employment opportunities. We must plan for our future now and feed momentum by attracting new businesses and improving the quality of life for everyone who lives and works here.

Working with government, private industry, labor and academia, we can develop a next-generation economy for all that builds upon its competitive assets and allows the Pittsburgh region to take its place on the global stage as an energy leader.

Matt Smith


The writer is president of the Greater Pittsburgh Chamber of Commerce.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.