Letter to the editor: Clarifying Hempfield property tax issues | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Clarifying Hempfield property tax issues

There is so much misinformation about property taxes, it warrants a response. Many seek to scare Hempfield Area School District residents by saying the district is going to appeal their property, but that is absurd. The school board voted to appeal properties with a difference between fair market value (estimated price) and current market value (recent sale price) of greater than $250,000. In 2018, only two residences out of 18,000 met this threshold.

If your neighbor owns a home valued at $400,000 while yours is $150,000 but you are paying the same taxes, they are getting a tax break and you are not. When you sell your home, you are at a disadvantage if a similar home has a lower tax bill. That is unfair to the vast majority of property owners. Severely under-assessed properties a getting a subsidy or significant tax break on the backs of everyone else. Every property should be taxed appropriately.

Homeowners and local governments should continue to fight for fair tax assessments through appeals to ensure that all properties are treated equally and fairly under the law. Hempfield Area still has the sixth lowest school district taxes in Westmoreland County and we plan to keep it that way.

Paul Adams

Hempfield

The writer is on the Hempfield Area School Board.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.