Letter to the editor: Climate change, effects are clear, proven | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Climate change, effects are clear, proven

Kudos to Al Duerig’s response (“Wild claims about climate change, Trump, reparations”) to Rudy Gagliardi’s letter (“Trump will get my vote”) on Trump and climate change. When I read Gagliardi’s letter, I thought that maybe it was Rudy Giuliani using an alias. Giuliani, one of the heroes of 9/11 and now a ferocious supporter of President Trump, has become what the colonials once deemed “turncoat.”

To deny climate change and the effects of global warming, one is either illiterate or like Trump — i.e., refusing to recognize something receiving more public attention than himself.

Scientists worldwide have shown — proved — that global warming has dramatically reduced the size and depth of ice at both polar caps. They’ve proved that this change is affecting both land and sea creatures — for example, wider ranges for caribou, wider ranges for polar bears seeking their main food source of seals, and both orca and humpback whales descending further into Antarctic waters for food sources.

As for Trump doing more in two years than most accomplished in eight: a truly ridiculous statement. Trump has trumpeted that statement, but this administration is the 13th in my lifetime, and the only two that have accomplished less were Barack Obama and George W. Bush.

George A. West

Ligonier Township

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.