ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: College isn’t for all students | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: College isn’t for all students

I would like to thank Tom Davidson for his article “Pittsburgh region has thousands of job opportunities, Builders Guild says”. Although I am a retired educator, I have always felt that college is not the answer for everyone. I believe the problem is that parents do not agree with this thought. Why invest in something that will leave the graduate or parents with thousands of dollars in debt after graduation?

There are technical and trade schools that offer tuition-free education for graduating seniors. Not bad for both young men and women — graduate, get a job and be debt-free. Are our high schools inviting these types of schools to show opportunities to seniors? If not, they are making a terrible mistake.

My son attended a presentation by Pittsburgh Technical College during his senior year. He graduated from the school in two years, and was then hired for an entry-level job with one of Pittsburgh’s largest advertising companies. Today, he owns his own advertising firm.

I recently saw help-wanted signs offering carpenters $35 per hour plus benefits. Yes, young ladies, there are female carpenters. Put those numbers together over a one-year period.

It is up to parents. Everyone does not have to attend college. The drop-out rate is significantly lower at technical and trade schools than four-year colleges.

Joseph DelloStritto

Plum


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.