Letter to the editor: Corporate Transparency Act would harm small businesses | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Corporate Transparency Act would harm small businesses

Legislation will soon be heard in Congress requiring all small business owners with fewer than 20 employees to file reports with the U.S. Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. The Corporate Transparency Act is meant to help law enforcement track down criminals who form small shell companies for illicit activities. A giant government database of personal information would be compiled, largely provided by law-abiding small business owners.

The legislation may be well-intended, but it would create a security threat for small business owners and a massive paperwork burden. Personal information, like the business owner’s driver’s license or passport numbers, would be accessible to police and even foreign governments if they ask for it. That presents a huge risk for identity theft and fraud.

It also piles on more paperwork for all the small business owners least able to handle the additional burden. These company owners don’t have lawyers or accountants on staff to help them comply, yet not doing so could result in fines of up to $10,000 and three years in jail.

Stopping financial crimes and money laundering may be the goal, but this legislation is the wrong answer. I urge Pennsylvania’s Congressional delegation to vote against it.

Amy Watt

New Alexandria

The writer is secretary/treasurer of Watt’s Truck Center.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.