Letter to the editor: Crime victims need Marsy’s Law | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Crime victims need Marsy’s Law

As indicated by the article “Pa. voters will decide constitutional amendment on rights of crime victims,” Pennsylvanians will soon have the opportunity to vote on the Crime Victims’ Rights Amendment, known as Marsy’s Law.

As the article stated, the language in Marsy’s Law echoes the Pennsylvania Crime Victim Act, but without constitutional protections, these rights can be challenged. Put simply, victims currently have no recourse if their rights are violated.

Also, the ACLU’s assertions are incorrect and misleading. Marsy’s Law will not give victims more rights than defendants and furthermore, judges are highly experienced in weighing competing rights. In fact, 35 states already have constitutional rights for victims and there has not been a single instance, going back 30 years, in which a victim’s rights have been found to trump those of a defendant.

If equity and inalienable rights are the foundation of our nation, why would we deny victims equal constitutional protections as those already afforded to the accused by the Constitution?

I encourage all Pennsylvanians to educate themselves on Marsy’s Law and support equal rights for crime victims on Nov. 5.

Laurie MacDonald

South Side

The writer is president and CEO of the Center for Victims (centerforvictims.org).


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.