Letter to the editor: Danish prime minister being childish | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Danish prime minister being childish

Recently, media outlets including The New York Times have printed articles about a minor dustup between Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and President Trump. The gist of these articles is that Trump overreacted to Frederiksen’s innocent comment that any idea about the purchase of Greenland, a semi-autonomous part of Denmark, was “absurd.” Frederiksen’s viewpoint is that Trump does not understand that “the time when you buy and sell other countries and populations is over.”

Frederiksen may be correct about what countries may do today, but if Trump genuinely does not understand this, then how innocent is it to call the idea “absurd”? In a classroom discussion, if a student introduces an idea that is unrealistic because the student does not understand something, the teacher would be rightly castigated if he or she called the student’s idea “absurd.” Instead, the teacher would be expected to explain why the student’s idea probably would not work. To call it “absurd” is a derogatory remark directed at the speaker, not at the idea.

Frederiksen saw an opportunity to burnish her “sophisticated” image to a woke Danish population that is unhappy with her anti-immigration initiatives. She is like the cool kid who gets credit for insulting someone in class who as isn’t as cool as those in the in-group are. And now, when Trump calls her on it, and cancels a trip to Denmark, she feigns ignorance that what she did that was wrong — just as a child does.

Andrew N. Mewbourn


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.