Letter to the editor: Degradation of Schenley Park | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Degradation of Schenley Park

Schenley Park is a gift to our area from another age. The recent collapse of part of Serpentine Drive under the weight of a 36-ton tri-axle paving truck points up the neglect of our heritage.

Hiking trails from Bartlett Street playground to the silt-choked lake under Panther Hollow Bridge are a picture of neglect. Gutters are filled with silt, and plants have taken root. Sewers collect debris and limbs. Several areas evidence erosion. On the upper section, a trail slide several years ago is still protected by a sawhorse. The barricade seems part of the flora and fauna. When the rain comes, more erosion fills the stream below.

In July, people from as far away as Santa Barbara, Calif. were at the park for the Vintage Grand Prix charity event. What did visitors think?

Are park funds being diverted like storm water to other “pet” projects? The mayor needs to preserve this “green” jewel of an American urban park.

High-fives to the tri-axle driver trapped on the hillside for an hour, workers, the responders and recovery team. Nobody was injured.

Walt Peterson

Squirrel Hill


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.