Letter to the editor: Despite media’s messages, U.S. is doing well | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Despite media’s messages, U.S. is doing well

I don’t understand why the television media keep creating problems that don’t exist. Is it because they want to divide us or is there some other reason?

One problem is racism. Many of us grew up when there was actual racism, but our country is doing very well now. We elected a black president, for Pete’s sake, and now it’s totally acceptable for blacks and whites to marry. If someone is being mean to you, it may have nothing to do with your skin color; it may just be that you’re acting like a jackass.

Another problem the television media are pushing is that burning fossil fuels causes climate change. I’m not going to debate whether that is true or not; I’m just saying I don’t know what they expect us to do about it. Many of us grew up with pollution. There was black smoke coming out of every chimney. The steel mills had smoke coming out of their stacks in various colors. Car exhausts didn’t have pollution controls. The air is very clean now. Our country is doing well.

Still another problem they’re pushing is income inequality. Back in the 1950s, they really did pay women less than men for doing the same job. U.S. Steel got sued, and my mother got $1,000 in back pay. I believe there are laws now against gender discrimination. Our country has evolved and is doing very well.

So the next time the television media is pointing out a problem, look around and judge for yourself if it’s real.

Susan Stiles

North Huntingdon


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.