Letter to the editor: Dissecting Mon Valley’s Catholic community | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Dissecting Mon Valley’s Catholic community

The Diocese of Pittsburgh’s “On Mission for The Church Alive!” campaign is DOA in the Mon Valley. It has proved to be a strategic, systematic and painful dissection of our Catholic community.

Corpus Christi Parish in McKeesport is composed of the former St. Mary Czestochowa and six closed McKeesport parishes. St. Angela Merici, St. Patrick and St. Robert Bellarmine are not closed, but were added to our group recently.

Corpus Christi, famous for our Lenten fish fry, is a strong partner in the community, assisting the local food bank, the Boys and Girls Club, the police department and the Little Sisters of the Poor. Thousands and thousands of dollars have been donated over the years to these vital organizations. What happens to McKeesport without this support?

Our ZIP code may not be Mt. Lebanon, Fox Chapel or Cranberry Township, but we are a proud, vibrant, passionate, dynamic and faithful congregation. Corpus Christi Parish is financially and structurally sound. Substantial debt incurred by North Catholic High School, abuse survivors’ court cases and other parishes have riddled the diocese.

St. Mary Czestochowa Parish provided the diocese over 100 years of loyalty. Will the bishops be loyal to our faithful congregation for the next hundred?

Katherine Kolanko Coberly

Penn Township, Westmoreland County

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.