Letter to the editor: Enemies of the Second Amendment | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Enemies of the Second Amendment

So now we have an age-old gun manufacturer, Colt, capitulating to the leftist/socialist movement to chip away at the Second Amendment by stopping the sale of its AR-15 rifle to civilian customers (“Colt suspends production of AR-15 for civilian market.”) This is typical of businesses folding to the pressures of gun-control politics, like Walmart and Dick’s Sporting Goods.

However, I don’t blame them, as there is even a more dangerous enemy of the Second Amendment than the federal/state governments: trial lawyers. These manufacturers of “assault style” rifles (and any guns) are constantly under the threat of wrongful death lawsuits by politically charged district attorneys or attorneys general (insert Josh Shapiro here).

It doesn’t stop there. Private citizens are now afraid to defend their property/self/family against assailants due to the threat of wrongful death lawsuits by the perpetrators (i.e., the “victims”). Even if you are found not liable in civil court, you will be ruined financially by paying for your legal defense. This is why we need to enact “loser pays all” in civil liability suits, so that legal gun users should never be afraid to defend themselves. If this threat of financial ruin isn’t an infringement on the Second Amendment, I don’t know what is.

Greg Massung

North Huntingdon


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.