Letter to the editor: Excellent letter on Democrats & racism | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Excellent letter on Democrats & racism

For years I have enjoyed reading your letters to the editor, but Mary Beddingfield’s letter “Democrats’ racist rhetoric appalling” (July 30, TribLIVE) was among the best. This self-described black woman from Homewood did a masterful job of countering the tired old Democratic tactic of calling everyone who disagrees with the liberals as racists or white supremacists.

Democratic Baltimore Rep. Elijah Cummings went over the top in verbally accosting Trump’s acting Homeland Security chief Kevin McAleenan during congressional testimony last month. McAleenan is trying to do a very difficult job at the border with minimal help from Democrats like Cummings, who used to believe the crisis was made up by Republicans, despite his never visiting the border.

Trump did nothing more than turn the tables on Cummings’ sanctimony by pointing out horrifying deficiencies in crime, sanitation, child welfare and education in his own district of over 20 years despite millions of dollars in federal aid.

Vilifying border agents and their managers who are sent by us to protect our borders is akin to sending our young men to Vietnam to fight for us, only to have them spit upon and called “baby killers” when they return (unpatriotic). Some Democrats like Nancy Pelosi actually warned of impending raids, thus endangering ICE agents sent to arrest many felons.

Thank you, Mary, for your excellent, honest letter and the courage it took to submit it.

Michael Contes

New Kensington


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.