ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Expose fracking dangers | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Expose fracking dangers

Recent reporting reveals Attorney General Josh Shapiro investigating the shale industry for “environmental crimes” committed by the oil and gas industry in Washington County and other areas. Residents have long complained of fracking causing water and air pollution, illness and dead animals. And such complaints have long gone unanswered by a Department of Environmental Protection that too often sides with the industry. Not only should the industry be investigated but, likewise, the DEP.

Sadly, on the heels of Shapiro’s investigation comes the alarming reports of rare cancers — Ewing sarcoma and others — occurring among young people within the heavily fracked counties of Washington, Greene and Westmoreland. Experts have long warned that the detrimental effects of fracking could take years to surface, with initial harm coming from impacted and polluted water wells such as being reported in Upper Burrell and Plum. The recent book “Amity and Prosperity” details the degree to which this occurs. Fracking, with its carcinogen cocktails, pollutes, sickens and even kills.

With fracking and its consequences now in our midst, it would behoove this paper to keep its readers informed and not in the dark. Subscribers deserve better.

Ron Slabe

Oakmont


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.