Letter to the editor: Fairness in assessment appeals | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Fairness in assessment appeals

In 2018, many people bought homes in Allegheny County. Many of these new homeowners are now receiving notices from taxing bodies informing them that they are being considered for the Newcomer’s Tax. The tax is a penalty for buying a home with a bad assessment. This results in 35% to 40% annual increases in property taxes. County lawmakers have no plans to update values. This results is unequal, but legal, taxation of similar homes. There is a dim light of hope in the short term for newcomers.

In 2018, the state equalization board concluded that the common level ratio of assessments to arm’s length sales prices in Allegheny County was 86.2%. The factor is a result of the state finding the mean ratio of old assessments to 2018 sales. This means that assessment uniformity is measured more accurately than in the past. Advantage: Property owners. This means that all of the 2018 homebuyers in Allegheny County had assessments that were 86.2% of the sales price. The factor goes down as property values go up. Other examples of lower CLRs: Westmoreland County, 14.4; Butler County, 9.3%.

The county appeals board and the court are using a higher factor from 2017. This is absurd.

The remedy is simple. The appeals process must apply the 2018 factor based on the 2018 sales. If they refuse, this matter may end up in the courts. Property owners under appeal in Allegheny County, for a 2018 sale, should request the lower 86.2% factor now. It’s a matter of fairness.

Mike Suley


The writer, an assessment and real estate consultant, is a former manager of Allegheny County’s Office of Property Assessments.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.