Letter to the editor: Fetal tissue research crucial | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Fetal tissue research crucial

The recent decision of the Trump administration to curtail fetal tissue research is detrimental to the further development of life-saving therapies (“Trump administration imposes new restrictions on fetal tissue research,” June 5, TribLIVE). Fetal tissue research not only helps scientists develop therapies to prevent disease, but also treat existing diseases. Without fetal tissue research, vaccines preventing polio, rubella and measles, would not have been developed, placing millions of children at risk of disease.

Continuing fetal tissue research has the potential to advance treatment for conditions such as Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, human immunodeficiency virus and the Zika virus, helping improve the quality of life of those afflicted and providing scientists further insight into human development.

Although there are ethical objections, placing limitations on fetal tissue research could potentially cost lives. Furthermore, fetal tissue from legally obtained elective abortions and excess frozen embryos from in vitro fertilization would simply be discarded as medical waste. It would be unfortunate to discard fetal tissue as medical waste instead of utilizing it for life-saving research.

Kelly Geary


The writer is a nurse.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.