Letter to the editor: Fox News not fair, balanced | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Fox News not fair, balanced

Tucker Carlson

More hilarious than the comics section of the Trib are the occasional letters that extol Fox News as the “other side” of current political discourse.

The failure of so many to recognize the network’s dishonesty has led to their conviction that to get the “truth” out of any political controversy, they have to go outside ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC — the “fake news” mainstream outlets.

As a news junkie, I watch them all and can praise Fox for one thing: its decision to drop the laughable slogan “Fair and Balanced.” One has to be a masochist to regularly watch Fox’s three-hour prime-time agenda of Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham. Hannity, especially, displays his Trump sycophancy and serves as a willing “roadie” at Trump rallies.

From its inception in 1996, billionaire Rupert Murdoch and accused sexual harasser Roger Ailes began Fox News as a political tool by which they could control the Republican party. Fox News has always been a propaganda outlet masquerading as a legitimate news source. But, truth be told, it has been crucial in shaping our politics. Conservative political commentator David Frum observed: “Republicans originally thought that Fox worked for us; now we’re discovering that we work for Fox.”

I applaud the Democratic National Committee for rejecting Fox News as a sponsor for any primary debates for the Democratic presidential candidates. It knows Fox is incapable of hosting a fair and neutral debate.

Robert Jedrzejewski


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.