Letter to the editor: Franklin-Regional must meet needs of all students | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Franklin-Regional must meet needs of all students

Franklin Regional’s auditor confirmed its bond financing limit is $122 million, minus the current $22.5 million bond obligation.

Franklin Regional’s architect estimated maintenance costs on existing facilities for the next five to 10 years to be between $74 million and $98 million (as of April 11, 2017). With only $100 million financing available, how will maintenance ($74 million to $98 million), the additional Sloan campus costs ($35 million-plus) and renovations to the middle school and high school be funded? Those numbers suggest a funding shortfall of more than $10 million, and no plan for middle school or high school renovations.

All students need improved classrooms for modern instruction methods, notably those nearest graduation. Where is the planning for middle school and high school academic and program facility renovations?

How do we best meet the facility needs of all Franklin Regional students?

Vote to restructure the Franklin Regional School Board to re-prioritize academic and facilities objectives for all students.

Walter Cebulak


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.