Letter to the editor: Get informed on guns, NRA | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Get informed on guns, NRA

Another biased and ill-informed letter from Robert Jedrzejewski (“NRA’s terroristic ways”) — on 9/11 no less. We of the NRA use the organization to lobby just like unions, businesses and other organizations. We don’t have to agree, just express our wishes. It would be nice if people checked facts instead of being confused by them.

The “terrorist” NRA provides training for our military and law enforcement — terrifying, isn’t it? The “hostages” it holds are also held by anti-gun groups, education unions and myriad others. Has anyone made a threat against your life? It has happened to some of our members, and that is a terroristic threat — which can be a felony.

Automatic weapons have been restricted since the 1930s. AR rifles are not military assault weapons; in fact, they were developed as semiautomatics for civilians and modified and adopted by our military.

The Second Amendment is not about hunting but is a means to protect ourselves and the Constitution, including the First Amendment Jedrzejewski likes to exercise. I spent nine years helping to defend those rights even though I disagreed with some of them. So please, if you want to express your opinion, get properly informed.

Allen Clark

Avonmore


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.