Letter to the editor: GOP leaders put party ahead of country | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: GOP leaders put party ahead of country

In the early ’70s, the congressional investigation of President Nixon’s involvement in the Watergate break-in provided us viewers with an excellent example of collaboration between Democratic and Republican lawmakers who placed our nation’s interest ahead of political parties. During the televised hearings, it was plain to see that the senators on the judiciary committee placed our nation’s interest ahead of political parties.

Unfortunately, that statesmanship and camaraderie is nonexistent today. Judiciary committee hearings focusing on possible obstruction of justice by the Trump administration have consisted of Republican congressmen’s refusal to delve into evidence that was revealed in Robert Mueller’s report. Their questions to witnesses do not focus on obstruction. They follow President Trump’s playbook: the Mueller report was a hoax, no faith or trust in intelligence agencies, a hostile media, blame on President Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Republican congressmen followed suit with recent witness Corey Lewandowski, former Trump campaign manager. Lewandowski refused to answer most of the questions posed by Democratic committee members, whom he addressed as “Trump haters” in his opening statement. It was clear to me that Lewandowski either sandbagged the committee or flat-out lied.

It is important that we, as voters, take note of this irresponsible behavior. I can remember when the Republican Party stood for the rule of law, compromise, bipartisanship, free trade and fiscal responsibility, but it is eroding into the Trump party, where our lawmakers exhibit blind allegiance to the president’s whims and wishes.

Michael Vranesevic


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.