Letter to the editor: GOP must address Trump’s hate talk | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: GOP must address Trump’s hate talk

Up until now, I have believed that the best way to defeat Donald Trump in 2020 is to focus on advocating for the federal government to do more to help the lower and middle classes with their economic and financial struggles to survive and to pay their bills.

So, I have largely ignored his ignorant remarks in which he demeans, degrades, insults, bullies and disrespects minority groups, women and immigrants. I have done this partly because I have believed from day one that this has all been a big act, that he is a master manipulator and con man who really doesn’t believe the ridiculous things he says, and that he cleverly figured out that he could win the presidency by pretending that he believes in what he thinks that 51% of the American people believe in — hate. But his hate-talk has now become too dangerous. He is playing with fire. This big act and game has to stop.

I call on all of the goodhearted conservative Republicans in the U.S. who have a conscience to join former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley and call out Trump and for all Republicans in Congress who have been silent about this evilness to also call out Trump on this hate talk. The people who he has insulted and disrespected don’t deserve to hear any more of his brutality.

Stewart B. Epstein

Rochester, N.Y.

The writer is a former Squirrel Hill resident who taught at West Virginia and Slippery Rock universities.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.