Letter to the editor: Government should manage water runoff | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Government should manage water runoff

Regarding the articles “Storm water strategies to be shared in Latrobe” (April 11, TribLIVE) and “Public hearing scheduled to discuss flood plan for Westmoreland County” (April 14, TribLIVE), about controlling rainwater runoff: It doesn’t matter what local paper I read, the suggestions from experts from various organizations are all the same: plant rain gardens, install rain barrels, and replace solid paved walkways, patios and driveways with permeable materials.

Local officials are in charge of communities’ safety, but they rarely explain their plans for water runoff.

It isn’t the residents’ fault; why should people alter their landscapes for a heavy rainstorm or two, especially when the local government has the responsibility of keeping storm drains and sewers clear along the streets?

We rarely hear about their plans or see them clearing out leaves, twigs and other road debris. If local governments would maintain the main catch basins, we citizens would have less to worry about and less landscape changes. Residents may have to give up some public perks, but they should have their patios, driveways and walkways the way they like them instead of bowing to a couple of heavy rainstorms that officials are not willing to prepare for.

Peg Bittner

South Park


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.