Letter to the editor: Greensburg residents didn’t ‘abuse’ brush pickup | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Greensburg residents didn’t ‘abuse’ brush pickup

I was shocked to see my neighbors’ home featured in your July 10 article, “People ‘abusing’ Greensburg brush pickup program.” The picture implies my neighbors “abuse” this program. I can tell you, driving past it daily for weeks, that their “large pile of brush” is no bigger than leaf piles left in the street during autumn cleanup.

I saw egregious piles — 20 feet long, 5 feet high — left in city streets this spring. It is of piles like this the Public Works Department is complaining.

I have known the family of my Rowan Avenue neighbors for over 30 years. They are upstanding citizens, living in the city for multiple generations. They belong to civic organizations, committed to Greensburg’s vitality. I say this not because such individuals could not “abuse the system,” but rather to speak to their character.

I do not think that my neighbors deserved to be shamed for their use of the city’s brush pickup program. They did nothing wrong.

Susan Wilson

Greensburg


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.