Letter to the editor: Hate of Trump indefensible | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Hate of Trump indefensible

Recent letters have proclaimed the legitimacy of hating President Trump. Webster defines hatred as prejudicial hostility, with such synonyms as loathe, detest, abhor and abominate.

Claims implying that many loyal supporters of our duly elected president are “moonshine-swilling hillbillies” who will probably lose their immortal souls (i.e., go to hell) were justified by listing a grand total of four supposed Republicans who hate our president (“Love, hate for Donald Trump,” June 21, TribLIVE). One is quoted as saying “Everything about Donald Trump’s presidency and character is a disaster for America.” Sounds much like Hillary Clinton calling many of the millions of Americans who elected Trump “deplorables.” Even those who view the Trump-bashing 24/7 on MSNBC and CNN and read it in The New York Times and Washington Post cannot defend the truth of those one-sided claims.

The cabal of the liberal media, the Washington bureaucratic swamp and the party that lost the 2016 presidential election direct their hate at the person, not his programs or efforts to help our country. It seems they will stop at nothing to try to remove Trump from office.

When states were considering hate-crime laws, they determined that increasing communication among different factions reduced the levels of hate and prejudice. It follows, then, that if the media presented both sides fairly, political hate would diminish.

Ask yourself: Does this political hate help or hurt our country?

Ron Raymond

Buffalo Township


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.