Letter to the editor: Heartland will again pull through for Trump | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Heartland will again pull through for Trump

Much has been made that President Trump’s election was invalid because he lost the popular vote. Accordingly, efforts are underway by the left to derail the Electoral College process in ways that would elect the presidency by popular vote.

In 2016, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by a little less than 3 million votes — not by that much when you consider her campaign outraised and outspent Trump’s, and she received most of the major media endorsements.

Clinton’s popular-vote edge was primarily from the densely populated areas where she concentrated her campaign. In fact, if you remove all of California’s votes for Clinton and for Trump from the nationwide election results, Trump wins the total popular vote of all the remaining states.

Even though New York and California are the most populous and hopelessly Democratic states, don’t be surprised if in 2020, “The Donald” doesn’t overcome that West Coast/East Coast liberal syndrome, and score again with the Electoral College votes from the heartland.

Ken Mowl


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.