Letter to the editor: How about a new amendment to protect all life? | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: How about a new amendment to protect all life?

I begin by pointing out what common sense tells us — that even after the tragedies of last weekend, a constitutional repeal of the Second Amendment would never pass. Too many conservatives would oppose it. It would have the same chance of passing as a constitutional amendment to reverse Roe v. Wade. Too many liberals would oppose it.

But what about an amendment to the U.S. Constitution which would, at the same time, overturn them both? Might not the vast majority of Americans not on either fringe be willing to trade our status quo for this new hope?

Now seems like the right time for making such a radical proposal, a proposal with the potential to save hundreds of thousands of lives each year, and furthermore, greatly reduce the ever-growing fear Americans now have to gather in public places.

Here is what such an amendment might look like:


Given that all life is sacred and must be protected, be it enacted that:

Abortion in any form will no longer be permitted or allowed in these United States; and

The right to “bear arms” found in the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution is hereby repealed.

Patrick Malley


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.