Letter to the editor: How to find poll workers | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: How to find poll workers

Regarding the article “Election officials campaign for poll workers in Allegheny, Westmoreland counties”: There are many ways to find poll workers that our counties don’t use, For instance:

•Allow split shifts. The 15-hour day currently required of poll workers is just not possible for many people. However, allowing split shifts will require a change in the Pennsylvania’s 1937 election code. This code desperately needs updating.

• Partner with local companies. In many parts of the United States, companies encourage employees to volunteer to work the polls as a “civic day.” It’s good for companies, employees and election administration.

These are only two examples of improved practices used to recruit poll workers. Many poll workers do this job because of a deep commitment to democracy. Pay is not the central issue, and focusing on pay alone misses the point that many election administrators, as well as state legislators who control the laws governing elections, have simply failed us by not adapting to change.

Election administration is a professional field, just like medicine, communications and retail marketing. The way these other professions operate has evolved over the last quarter-century, but somehow, election administrators are still trying to recruit poll workers the way they did in the 1970s.

Juliet Zavon

Squirrel Hill

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.