Letter to the editor: Hunters need more opportunities | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Hunters need more opportunities

In response to letter-writer Sylvie Pomicter (“Say ‘no’ to Sunday hunting,” Feb. 11, TribLIVE): Pennsylvania is rich in hunting tradition, and unfortunately we are losing our youth and adult hunters because of lack of opportunity.

Pennsylvania is one of three states that do not allow Sunday hunting for big and small game. Hunting is a time to spend with friends and family, a time to bond and teach responsibility to our youth. Sitting in a tree stand is very relaxing for me.

Unfortunately, there are a few bad hunters who trespass and don’t respect private property, but don’t group us law-abiding hunters in with them. Deer and small-game seasons run in most counties for 2½ to 3½ months depending on what you are hunting, so the animals have the rest of the year to have a day off.

When was the last time you heard of a hunter shooting a person walking through the woods? Hunting accidents are extremely rare.

So I get that you don’t like hunting. That’s fine, but I would bet that a hunter shot a deer that would have damaged your vehicle, costing thousands of dollars damage.

Mark Rulis

Parks Township

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.