Letter to the editor: Idea of reparations absurd | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Idea of reparations absurd

Many Democratic presidential hopefuls are advocating reparations for either or both African-American and LGBTQ communities. Their reasoning includes slavery compensation for the former and historical tax inequities for the latter. As a full-blooded Italian- American, I propose that individuals of my nationality also deserve similar consideration.

In the late 1800s, Italians were heavily discriminated against and denied employment. Newspapers, such as the Gazette in Iowa, even recommended not to hire Italians because they “were not in sympathy with institutions and not desirable elements in the population.” Also, many derogatory descriptions were circulated to describe Italian workers. Sicilians were viewed by many Americans as culturally backward and racially suspect. In addition, the 1891 lynchings in New Orleans and elsewhere resulted in unjustified execution of many Italians.

Although the above is factually correct, I am not being truly sincere in asking to be compensated for the historical abhorrent treatment of Italians. In truth, discrimination to some degree has been experienced by many diverse domestic groups throughout our history.

Attempting to equitably compensate today’s generations for such inequities of the past is neither justified nor possible. How would such reparations be disseminated? Who actually would be compensated? In what form would such reparations take? After careful thought and consideration, the absurdity of such proposals should be obvious.

John Lapina

Irwin


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.