ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Ignoring facts |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Ignoring facts

So often, after reading the op-ed page and letters from readers, I’m amazed that so many people do not or cannot think for themselves; how many ignore or cannot comprehend facts and how many are sheep-like — i.e., must be led.

Jack Bologna (“Global lukewarming,” Feb. 15, TribLIVE) wrote against the fact of global warming. Scientists worldwide have proven how the ice shelves, both arctic and Antarctic, have shrunken, both in size and depth. They have monitored and noted how desert temperatures are rising. Worldwide snowfall has diminished — another proven fact. I have to wonder on which planet Bologna has been living.

And on the Trump wall: Trump’s words seem to indicate that all immigrants at our southern border are drug dealers or criminals of other ilk. Having lived in Texas for five years, I know that this idea is wrong. More drugs come through legitimate checkpoints. And, with thousands of miles of shoreline, how much comes in by boat undetected? Finally, the opioid epidemic is as severe as other drug use, and most opioids are manufactured in the United States.

To not realize and recognize these facts indicates a closed mind, an unwillingness to accept anything people don’t wish to recognize.

George A. West

Ligonier Township

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.