Letter to the editor: Importance of early education | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Importance of early education

In Gov. Tom Wolf’s recent budget proposal, education was at the forefront. As the owner of a STAR 4 childcare program, I am happy to see a growing understanding of the importance of funding of high-quality early education for all children. Specifically, the governor’s proposed investment of $50 million for high-quality pre-K is a big win for thousands of Pennsylvania’s youngest children.

Our program was awarded 20 pre-K slots for families in need. Those funds were only thanks to increases in last year’s state budget. We continue to have children who are eligible for this program but sit on waiting lists due to lack of funding.

Looking at next year’s budget, there are still over 600 income-eligible children in our local schools who are missing out on the opportunity to attend high-quality pre-K. Across Westmoreland County, 2,400 children are missing out, and statewide, 98,000. We must keep pushing to reach all at-risk children, and I hope in this budget cycle, our legislators push to expand access.

I am excited that the conversation around pre-K investment has elevated the focus on early learning, and I hope our local legislators, including Rep. George Dunbar and Sen. Kim Ward, continue to champion this funding.

Kate Berger

North Huntingdon

The writer is director and owner of JB’s Bright Beginnings.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.