Letter to the editor: JCC support of Planned Parenthood | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: JCC support of Planned Parenthood

JCC & Planned Parenthood

The Jewish Community Center of Pittsburgh will host a Planned Parenthood of Western Pennsylvania fundraiser Nov. 9 titled “Drag Bingo In Support of PPWP.”

That the family-friendly JCC will host a fundraiser for Planned Parenthood is indicative of a general misunderstanding in the Jewish community about the abortion provider that kills innocent children. PPWP is marketed as a nonprofit health care option for women, but I believe it exploits vulnerable women and allows corruption of naïve minors with an organization built on the eugenics ideology of founder Margaret Sanger.

I wonder if the JCC leadership has been informed that Planned Parenthood clinics may fail to report sex trafficking, might not comply with standard medical practices and informed consent guidelines, and, I believe, promote unhealthy sexual lifestyles to teens.

PPWP destroys over 3,100 lives every year whose destiny on earth was violently interrupted in similar fashion to Jews’ lives historically — first denied personhood and equal protection under the law, then redefined as non-human, tortured and executed.

Judaism was the first religion in history to consider each human life as sacred, and the first to prohibit child sacrifice. To learn more, please visit www.jewishprolifefoundation.org.

Cecily Routman

Sewickley

The writer is president of the Jewish Pro-Life Foundation.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.