Letter to the editor: Jeannette ‘city of champions’? | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Jeannette ‘city of champions’?

After the shooting in my hometown (“Jeannette police identify fatal shooting victim, suspect in McKee Stadium incident,” Sept. 6, TribLIVE), I felt it was time for me to make my voice heard.

My dad was brought up in Jeannette. Growing up, I viewed him as a legend, and on Sept. 6, I feared the worst — that my legend was laid to rest where he was raised.

How can you call this a “city of champions” when there isn’t even a grocery store? If you believe this is a “city of champions,” I suggest taking a ride down Clay Avenue to get a clearer view. Theaters, boutiques and even a community pool once kept this now ghost town alive.

Jeannette is known as the Glass City. What happens to glass if not handled properly? It shatters, and that it did. Rundown factories leave remnants of an eerie scene of blood, sweat and tears of past roots.

It seems the first priority of this “city of champions” is its sports teams. The turf at McKee Stadium is pristine, some of the nicest I’ve seen, but our roads are poorly managed. The firm foundation this town was built upon has fractured.

We don’t have to sit back and accept this. Future generations deserve to feel safe and protected. If everyone worked together by putting to rest past grievances and accepted one another, perhaps what began as a one-woman wave in Jeannette, Pa., could inspire a nation to stand up one by one and create a rippling wave of positive change. Now that would make Jeannette the “city of champions“ to me.

Amy Jupena

Penn Township, Westmoreland County


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.