Letter to the editor: Kids & climate change | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Kids & climate change

School taxes in the U.S. are obscenely high, so we’d hope that the kids are getting a good education, learning some math, etc.

But alas, recently they were allowed to cut classes to scream in the streets about “stopping climate change.” The goal of the movement: impose new taxes on our energy.

I’d hoped they’d learn math so that they could (someday) write for us a mathematical differential equation for climate systems using heat transfer, fluid mechanics and thermodynamics to demonstrate the amount of new energy taxes we’d pay (on gasoline, electricity) to “stop climate change” — “silly science denier” and degreed engineer that I am.

A helpful hint for the kids to start with: The Chinese, the largest emitters of carbon pollution on the planet, won’t be paying any tax, so the equation will need to multiply our U.S. tax to compensate for the Chinese paying none.

Perhaps Sweden’s Greta Thunberg could lead the kids in writing this climate model for us, overseen by the loyal party cadre teachers, of course.

Given the state of U.S. education today — we spend the most of any industrial country and get the worst results — I suspect the proceeds of the new taxes will be directed, via government grant money, to employing the unemployable kids at “climate nonprofits,” where they can play office and (profitably) train the next generation of professional-protester- drone-shock-troops to obey their commissar handlers and riot at a moment’s notice. Sad.

Carl Colpo

Burgettstown


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.