Letter to the editor: Kim Ward fights for community | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Kim Ward fights for community

The Tribune-Review wrote two articles on Tay Waltenbaugh announcing his candidace for state Senate (“Retired human services executive Tay Waltenbaugh to challenge Kim Ward for state Senate,” June 12, TribLIVE; “Democrat Tay Waltenbaugh announces state Senate run in Jeannette,” June 12, TribLIVE). I felt a need to tell the other side of the story.

As a former councilman in the city of Jeannette, I worked with Sen. Kim Ward, who brought millions of dollars to our struggling city. The grants were used to clean up the Monsour site as well as have the former glass plant property remediated so the Elliot Group could expand to hire another 100 new employees. Ward also helped Elliot by widening the turnpike lane so that its trucks wouldn’t have to take an 80-mile detour because of their size. Ward played a key part in landing another $600,000 grant for flood control in our city.

Ward is a fighter for our community as well as all of the other communities in the Senate’s 39th District. The difference couldn’t be clearer: Waltenbaugh brings public housing, Ward brings jobs and economic development — jobs that will help sustain a community and let it thrive.

Mark Levander

Jeannette


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.