Letter to the editor: Leave judgment to God | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Leave judgment to God

Aside from being blasphemous, Rudolph Puchan’s letter “Was Trump divine intervention?” (Sept. 5, TribLIVE) borders on the inane. Only an idol-worshiping true believer could imagine that Donald Trump is a blessing from the Almighty. Puchan needs to get a grip.

When such a self-righteous man gets on his anti-abortion soapbox, he needs to be reminded that he isn’t equipped with Fallopian tubes. Making judgments about a woman’s moral right to choose lies in the province of our maker alone. Who are men to cast the first stone, anyway?

Furthermore, Puchan’s claim that “there are those in power who hate everything about America” is a vile Trump canard. He goes on to maintain, “They say we are a racist nation, want to erase our nation’s history, do not believe America is an exceptional nation, want God out of our lives, and think rugged individualism is dead … .” Who is this delusional “they” we’re talking about here? I’m almost 70 years old, and I grew up saying the Pledge of Allegiance, attending Sunday school, joining the Boy Scouts and playing Little League baseball.

While I consider myself just as loyal and patriotic as anyone else, I firmly believe that Trump is an indelible stain on American ethos. He has no character, no sense of humility and no trace of shame.

Those who worship the political golden calf of the Trump personality cult really need to stop so snidely condemning others. Jesus said “love thy neighbor as thyself.”

Passing judgment is God’s work, Mr. Puchan. It certainly isn’t yours.

Jim Harger

New Kensington

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.