Letter to the editor: Let’s try posting the Ten Commandments | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Let’s try posting the Ten Commandments

The recent rash of mass shootings once again stimulates the knee-jerk reaction to ban semiautomatic and other guns without any observation of the moral breakdown in our society that may be contributing to such violent behavior.

There are signs posted in schools and government buildings banning guns and noting gun-free zones. I believe they have proven useless and are unconstitutionally banning the right for a citizen to bear arms.

Yet, the Ten Commandments are banned in public schools and government buildings — despite the Constitution specifically stating that there shall be no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion.

Imagine if smokers around the country got the ACLU to ban “no smoking” signs. Wouldn’t that send a message to smokers everywhere that they can go ahead and light up? Instead, we have banned the moral code that tells our kids not to lie, cheat, steal or murder. What message does that send?

The reason the Constitution included the right to bear arms was not for the sake of hunters, but rather to protect citizens from a ruthless, powerful and unopposed government. Frankly, I am not sure what is more fearful — the unopposed powerful government bureaucrats, or the crazed psychopaths.

Joel I. Last

Greensburg


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.