Letter to the editor: Look closer to home for SummerSounds | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Look closer to home for SummerSounds

I agree completely with letter-writer Marion Sedlako regarding the wisdom of spending $10,000 for SummerSounds entertainment from Russia (“SummerSounds doesn’t need Russian band,” May 10, TribLIVE). I wasn’t aware that was being planned, but I have wondered, in the past, why the SummerSounds program director bypasses some of the great talent from our own region.

World-class talent is easily available within driving distance. If the directors of SummerSounds are at a loss in the recognition of great regional talent, we also have very knowledgeable music professors who have retired from teaching and would probably be pleased to act as consultants.

Entertainment talent horizons could be expanded, if desired, by looking no farther than Chicago. For variety, one could explore the evolutionary timeline of American music from ragtime, blues, trad-jazz, country and Western, syncopated jazz, modern jazz, modern improvisation, polytonal, swing, do-wop, disco, and more. There are excellent groups, within driving distance, that specialize in one or more of those genres. It might be interesting and easily educational by simple assimilation.

Joseph G. Cremonese

Hempfield


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.