Letter to the editor: Mueller did not exonerate Trump | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Mueller did not exonerate Trump

Regarding Rep. Guy Reschenthaler’s op-ed “Mueller show’s over; it’s time to move on”: Robert Mueller does not do “shows.” He investigates and makes recommendations to courts, Congress and the Department of Justice.

Mueller did not exonerate Donald Trump of collusion. As a former JAG officer, you, Mr. Reschenthaler, certainly know that collusion is not a legal term and therefore a person would not be charged or exonerated.

Mueller did not clear Trump of obstruction of justice. He wrote and testified that he did not make that determination because of the DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.

Mueller was tasked with determining if the Russians interfered in our 2016 election, and it is clear that they did. Congress has a duty to secure our elections, but you, Mr. Reschenthaler, voted against the House bill to do just that. Mueller cited numerous times that Trump and his campaign were in contact with Russian operatives and numerous times Trump tried to obstruct the investigation of himself.

Congress must use the Mueller report to determine if the president conspired to obstruct justice. If Trump is innocent and wants the country to move on, he should be encouraging his advisers to respond to congressional subpoenas and provide all emails and memos to exonerate himself.

Congress has a duty to investigate. Trump should want to put all his evidence on record. He will either exonerate himself or indict himself. Only then, Mr. Reschenthaler, can the country move on.

Renalda Arndt

South Huntingdon


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.