ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: New leadership needed for Penn Hills schools | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: New leadership needed for Penn Hills schools

I am concerned about the lack of candidates running for Penn Hills School Board. Only two candidates — both current board members, including the president — have filed petitions to run. Sadly, five seats are up for election.

That means both incumbents will have a free ticket to continue their reign of ineffective leadership, and, if no one else runs, people who may or may not be qualified to do the job will be appointed. Right now, it seems the board president controls the school directors.

We need intelligent people on the school board who genuinely have the best interests of both the students and taxpayers at heart. I don’t believe this describes the two incumbents seeking re-election.

I hope Penn Hills residents will search their hearts and, if they have a desire to make a difference in the school district, consider asking friends and neighbors to write their names on the ballot in the May 21 primary election so they can be candidates in the November general election.

A quality school district is a town’s greatest asset. No family is going to buy a house in a community if their children can’t get a quality education in the local school district. The Penn Hills School District is a mess and in dire need of good leadership.

Bethany Williams

Penn Hills


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.