Letter to the editor: Not vaccinating has consequences | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Not vaccinating has consequences


Many readers, politicians and media types do not understand that freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences. Yes, we live in a country with many freedoms and the right to exercise those freedoms. But there are consequences, both good and bad, for exercising those freedoms.

Colin Kaepernick exercised his freedom of speech. Consequently, he was let go by the NFL. A person can yell “Fire!” in a crowded theater, but if there is no fire will likely be prosecuted. A person can own and fire a gun, but there will be negative consequences if he or she goes into a crowded area and start firing randomly into the air.

People are free to not vaccinate their children, but shouldn’t be surprised if a doctor says they can’t be seen or a school says they can’t attend (“Rep. Metcalfe pushes bill requiring doctors to treat unvaccinated kids,”).

Doctor’s offices and schools host many people who can’t be vaccinated. A person has a right to not vaccinate, but has no right to endanger others. An unvaccinated child is a loaded gun in the presence of those who can’t be vaccinated. Doctors and schools have a responsibility to protect the most vulnerable. Denied access to those facilities are the consequences of not vaccinating.

Darryn Zawitz


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.