Letter to the editor: NRA’s terroristic ways | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: NRA’s terroristic ways

What if we were to expand the definition of terrorist organizations beyond those that practice or promote terrorism to include any organization that works to obstruct all effort to eliminate or lessen that terror? If that were to happen I would nominate the National Rifle Association to be foremost among them.

The NRA’s perennial effort to thwart meaningful gun control legislation — even after repeated mass killings — is a national disgrace. The NRA could likewise be considered a terrorist organization for holding virtually all Republican legislators hostage to its political lobbying power — that is, unless they are struck with “Stockholm Syndrome” (where the victims of abduction come to agree with and empathize with their abductors).

The singular constant in all these too-frequent mass shootings is — surprise! — guns, specifically automatic weapons. Concentrating on banning assault-style weapons alone would seem to eventually have a salubrious effect. But in every case after a mass shooting the NRA calls the shots (pun intended) and nothing is done. Leader Wayne LaPierre appears and utters the NRA’s tired and worn rationale, i.e. the slippery slope argument (recently parroted by Donald Trump) that anyone who proposes sensible gun control wants to destroy the Second Amendment and take away everybody’s hunting rifle.

Next to engaging in widespread voter suppression and thus attacking a bedrock principle of our democracy, caving in to the NRA is the most despicable and cowardly thing Republican legislators do. What a spineless bunch of so-called public servants.

Robert Jedrzejewski


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.