Letter to the editor: Obama vs. Trump | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Obama vs. Trump

To better understand how we descended into this era of hate politics and partisan warfare, it is telling to compare the last two American presidents.

One was likable, charismatic; the other outspoken, abrasive. One, a smooth-talking politician; the other, a direct-speaking businessman.

One, the media’s darling; the other, the media’s target.

One’s policies favored big government and socialism; the other, individual opportunity and capitalism.

One, in eight years, was a well-liked but ineffective president; the other, a highly ridiculed but very effective president (in three years, he reduced taxes, created record employment and a dynamic economy, and improved security).

All these differences have led to this era of hate politics, sparked by the loss of the presidential election, loss of power and dislike of the president.

Whatever happened to our balanced, objective news media and the inclusive Democratic Party of Jack Kennedy? Today’s Democrats spend all their time and energy investigating and trying to impeach President Trump, and proposing all kinds of politically advantageous but economically destructive, socialistic give-away programs that our country can’t afford.

Look at Venezuela, with its once oil-rich economy. About 40,000 Venezuelans, under their socialistic regime, are leaving by foot each day to neighboring Colombia because they lack food, jobs, medicine and safety.

Democrats should get over their hate for Trump and start working with him for the good of the country. And our biased, liberal media should present all side of political issues.

Ron Raymond

Buffalo Township


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.