Letter to the editor: Obituary for the Pittsburgh Steelers | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Obituary for the Pittsburgh Steelers

After a long illness, the Steelers died Sept. 8 in New England. Once a revered NFL organization, a “cancer” — first diagnosed in January 2017 after a 36-17 playoff loss at New England — ravaged the Steelers’ legacy. Not the loss, but the way they lost, caused this cancer. Symptoms? Young players not understanding what it really means to wear the Steelers uniform.

Hope was, players like James Harrison might come to training camp with the cure. He could not. In that 2017 season, Coach Mike Tomlin prescribed for the Steelers to remain in the locker room during the anthem, leaving teammate — and military veteran — Alejandro Villanueva to stand alone. Big Ben stated regret for not standing with Villanueva … a failure of leadership. The cancer metastasized.

Near season’s end, Harrison’s cancer went into remission. His cure? A Patriots uniform. Did Harrison witness the Patriots disrespect our national anthem? No. Did he experience acrimony in the Patriots’ locker room? No.

Last season, Rocky Bleier proposed a treatment, which worked briefly. But cancer is resistant — presenting this time as a fur coat-clad AB. The result? One of our most talented teams ever missed the playoffs. Art Rooney Sr. wasn’t available for consult. His early intervention would have been cut the tumor (Tomlin) and the metastases (Le’Veon Bell/AntonioBrown). As witnessed Sept. 8, the cancer was terminal.

Tomlin’s post-game comments made clear his own terminal illness: a “rinse and repeat” of last season’s post-lost-game comments. Tomlin’s memorial will likely be scheduled before season’s end.

Barrrett S. McGrath

Pinehurst, N.C.

The writer is a Pittsburgh native whose grandfather played football with Art Rooney Sr. at Duquesne University.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.